Built for teams that maintain many codebases
Not agent transcripts. Not vague diagnostics. Concrete engineering output.
Workers change code on a branch, run checks and package the result as a PR your team can inspect, approve or reject.
Each worker gathers the relevant code context, logs, test output and findings before asking you to approve risky work.
When checks fail, Orcheduct classifies the failure and prepares a targeted repair path instead of leaving the developer to dig.
Pushes, merges, cleanup, SSH and other risky actions stay gated. The worker can move fast without getting unchecked power.
Useful for teams responsible for dozens of client or legacy repositories where small fixes consume senior developer attention.
Track accepted outcomes, time to first PR and work completed without technical intervention so the product proves its value.
Describe the bug, change or maintenance task in plain English and choose the repository.
The worker reads the code, gathers context, checks logs or test output and builds an evidence-backed plan.
You stay in control of push, SSH, merge, cleanup and other sensitive actions.
Get a branch, commit, pull request, evidence summary and test status ready for human review.
The best fit is not a developer writing greenfield code all day. It is a team carrying many repositories, recurring bugs and client maintenance work.
Handle small fixes across client projects without pulling senior developers out of deep work.
Turn investigation, patching and PR preparation into a repeatable supervised workflow.
Keep software maintenance moving across many systems with evidence, gates and auditability.
Start with one supervised AI worker. Add more when you need parallel PRs across more projects.
View Plans & PricingStart with one worker on one repository and measure how much maintenance work reaches review without technical intervention.
Start with one worker